Protect people seeking protection

On 22 January 1954, Australia became one of the first signatories to a landmark agreement to protect the world’s asylum seekers and refugees.

Under the Refugee Convention, refugees deserve as a minimum the same standards of treatment enjoyed by other foreign nationals in a given country and, in many cases, the same treatment as nationals.

On 21 November 2012, Australia introduced a new level of unfairness in the way Australia treats asylum seekers who arrive by boat.

Under its “no advantage” test, asylum seekers who arrive by boat after 13 August, and all future arrivals, will wait years before being granted a protection visa – even after they have been found to be a refugee.

The arrangements for people on Bridging Visas under this “No advantage” test will be little different to the Howard Government’s Temporary Protection Visa (TPV) arrangements and will deliver extreme disadvantage, leaving asylum seekers, already deeply traumatised by their refugee journey, with:

  • No work rights
  • The lowest level of financial support available
  • No access to family reunion
  • The threat of being sent to Nauru or Manus Island at any time
  • A possible wait of about five years before they are granted a protection visa

It is not illegal to seek asylum by boat, yet the Australian Government is punishing asylum seekers for their mode of arrival.

Is this the way we treat vulnerable asylum seekers who ask Australia for protection?

How you can help

Please contact your local MP and let them know your concerns. You could tell them:

  • Withholding a protection visa to a recognised refugee for years under “no advantage” is a cruel and humiliating punishment of innocent, vulnerable people
  • Denying boat arrivals access to family reunion will cause more grief and actually encourage whole families to travel by boat
  • Denying recognised refugees work rights and providing the lowest social security support available is a very poor introduction to a new life in Australia and will undermine their capacity to contribute to Australian society
  • If the Government’s motivation is to save lives at sea, the answer is in encouraging safer pathways to protection, not by deterring desperate people who have few options but to seek asylum in Australia by boat
  • The answer lies in building stronger refugee protections in countries throughout Asia, as the Expert Panel has recommended

How to contact your local MP

http://aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Guidelines_for_Contacting_Senators_and_Members

Essential reading

Refugee Council of Australia media release on “no advantage”

http://refugeecouncil.org.au/n/mr/121121_Noadvantage.pdf

Minister for Immigration media release on “no advantage”

http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/media/cb/2012/cb191883.htm

Refugee Council of Australia analysis of the Expert Panel report

http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/r/rpt/2012-Expert-Panel.pdf

The Refugee Convention

http://unhcr.org.au/unhcr/images/1951%20Convention%20Q%20%20A.pdf

 

1 Comment »

 
  1. sanjitagnihotri says:

    Immigration is a sensitive topic all over the world.It is complex-to say the least.It is quite clear to me-both through personal experience and observation of others that historically and culturally inherited prejudices do not disappear.The followers of Jesus are no exception to this rule.In my own country,Bangladeshi(muslim) migration to India is a sensitive issue,which instantly evokes strong emotions.The issue becomes more complicated if the immigrant community seeks not only to zealously protect its old identity,but also has a sense of superiority about it.This is one of the topics about which I myself am fairly conservative.All my attempts to deal with my own anti-immigrant feelings have largely failed so far.

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.